RIVERWATCH v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

No. D030732.

91 Cal.Rptr.2d 322 (1999)

76 Cal.App.4th 1428

RIVERWATCH et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant and Appellant; Palomar Aggregates, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

As Modified January 12, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Sansone, County Counsel, Diane Bardsley, Chief Deputy County Counsel, and R. Mark Beesley, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant.

Hall & Associates, Carlyle W. Hall, Jr., Andrew Henderson, Los Angeles, and Bethany A. Dreyfus, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Remy, Thomas and Moose, Tina A. Thomas, Andrea A. Matarazzo, Sacramento, and Katherine Currie Pittard; Stephenson Worley Garratt, Schwartz, Heidel & Prairie, William J. Schwartz, Jr., and Jennifer Treese Wilson, San Diego, for Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.


BENKE, Acting P.J.

Real parties in interest and appellants Palomar Aggregates, Inc., and William Pankey (collectively Palomar) would like to develop a rock quarry on Rosemary's Mountain in the northeastern portion of San Diego County. After its initial application for a major use permit was opposed by officials of defendant and appellant the County of San Diego (the county), Palomar prepared a revised application, which the county eventually approved. Plaintiff and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases