1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 75 F.Supp.2d
  5. 75 F.Supp.2d 283 (1999)
 

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. PAUL FLUM IDEAS

No. 98 Civ. 5942 (RWS).

75 F.Supp.2d 283 (1999)

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. PAUL FLUM IDEAS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 9, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lieberman & Nowak, New York City, Arthur M. Lieberman, James M. Rhodes, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York City, Edward V. Filardi, of counsel, for defendant.

Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin, St. Louis, MO, Samuel Digirolamo, of counsel.

AMENDED OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Paul Flum Ideas, Inc. ("Flum") has moved: (1) pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure for partial summary judgment of invalidity of Claim 1 of United States Patent No. 5,646,176 (the "'176 Patent"); and (2) pursuant to Rule 56 for summary judgment of noninfringement of the '176 Patent. For the reasons set forth below, Flum's motion for summary judgment with respect to invalidity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases