HALE v. ROYAL LOGGING

No. 99-074.

990 P.2d 1245 (1999)

1999 MT 302

Wesley HALE, Claimant and Appellant, v. ROYAL LOGGING, Respondent/Insurer/Employer.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided December 7, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurie Wallace, Bothe & Lauridsen, P.C.; Columbia Falls, Montana, For Appellant.

Andrew J. Utick, Utick & Grosfield; Helena, Montana, For Respondent.


Justice JIM REGNIER delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Wesley Hale appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment of the Workers' Compensation Court, which declared that Hale was not entitled to permanent partial disability benefits under § 92-703.1, RCM (1975) and that Hale was not entitled to attorney fees or costs. The determinative issue on appeal is whether the Workers' Compensation Court erred when it concluded that Hale was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases