1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 733 A.2d
  5. 733 A.2d 1159 (1999)
 

STATE, TP. OF PENNSAUKEN v. SCHAD

733 A.2d 1159 (1999)

160 N.J. 156

STATE of New Jersey, TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Respondent, v. James SCHAD, Defendant-Respondent and Cross Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 28, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Joyce, Cherry Hill, for appellant and cross-respondent (Kelley, Wardell & Craig, attorneys).

Bradley J. Shafer, a member of the Michigan and Arizona bars, Lansing, MI, and John A. Underwood, Voorhees, for respondent and cross-appellant (Underwood & Micklin, attorneys; Robert E. Levy, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

In this case, a municipality applied the restrictive provisions of its sign ordinance against interior store displays that were visible from the exterior of the premises. The owner of the building premises contended that the ordinance did not apply to interior displays and that the enforcement of the ordinance was unconstitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases