1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 984 P.2d
  5. 984 P.2d 903 (1999)
 

SAIF v. STRUBEL

(97-03693; CA A101471)

984 P.2d 903 (1999)

161 Or. App. 516

In the Matter of the Compensation of Jon B. Strubel, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Interstate Distributor Co., Petitioners, v. Jon B. STRUBEL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 7, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Runner, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

ARMSTRONG, J.

SAIF seeks review of a decision by the Workers' Compensation Board that set aside SAIF's denial of claimant's claim. SAIF contends that the Board failed to apply the proper statutory test for a combined condition and, therefore, that the Board erred as a matter of law. We conclude that the Board applied the proper test and that the Board's conclusion is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm the Board's decision.

The administrative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases