ENERGY PIPELINE, INC. v. PUC


726 A.2d 1128 (1999)

ENERGY PIPELINE, INC. and Energy Production Company, Petitioners, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided March 17, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis S. Shilobod, Pittsburgh, for petitioners.

Wayne T. Scott, Harrisburg, for respondent.

Before COLINS, President Judge, and FRIEDMAN, J., and NARICK, Senior Judge.


COLINS, President Judge.

Before the Court is the appeal of Energy Pipeline, Inc. and Energy Production Company (collectively, Energy Pipeline) to the decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC). The PUC denied Energy Pipeline's Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs pursuant to the Administrative Agency Actions Act (Costs Act).1 We affirm.

The relevant facts are as follows.2 On January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases