1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 46 F.Supp.2d
  5. 46 F.Supp.2d 115 (1999)
 

WISEMAN v. PRATT & WHITNEY

No. 3:98CV00116 WWE.

46 F.Supp.2d 115 (1999)

Thomas A. WISEMAN, Plaintiff, v. PRATT & WHITNEY, a Division of United Technologies Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 24, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sylvia Denise Reid, Hartford, CT, for plaintiff.

Albert Zakarian, Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, CT, for defendant.

RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Pratt & Whitney ("P & W") moves this Court for an order of summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, alleging that plaintiff Thomas A. Wiseman ("Wiseman") has failed to meet his burden of production in this Title VII case. Wiseman, an African-American, brings this suit alleging discrimination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases