1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 736 A.2d
  5. 736 A.2d 768 (1999)
 

AGENCY OF NAT. RES. v. GLENS FALLS INS.

No. 98-073.

736 A.2d 768 (1999)

AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF VERMONT v. GLENS FALLS INSURANCE CO., Continental Insurance Co., Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. and Tamarack Services of South Burlington.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Motion for Reargument Denied August 2, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, and William Griffin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Montpelier, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William F. Ellis and Kevin J. Coyle of McNeil, Leddy & Sheahan, Burlington, for Defendants-Appellees Glens Falls Insurance Co. and Continental Insurance Co.

Michael B. Clapp, Burlington, for Defendant-Appellant Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

Present DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ., NORTON, Supr. J., and GIBSON, J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.

JOHNSON, J.

This case concerns a dispute among the parties and their insurers over the allocation of costs for the cleanup of a series of gasoline leaks. The superior court ruled that Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty) was responsible for approximately 92% of the costs, that the Continental/Glens Falls Insurance Company (Continental) was responsible for the balance, and that Liberty's counterclaim against the State of Vermont for contribution was without merit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases