1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 992 P.2d
  5. 992 P.2d 488 (1999)
 

HUTCHINSON, ANDERSON, COX AND COONS, P.C. v. CRONK

(16-97-06018; CA A103273)

992 P.2d 488 (1999)

164 Or. App. 532

HUTCHINSON, ANDERSON, COX AND COONS, P.C., an Oregon Professional Corporation, fka Hutchinson, Anderson, Cox, Parrish and Coons, P.C., Respondent, v. Richard CRONK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 22, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Goff, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

William H. Sherlock argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jessica L. Wood, Stephen A. Hutchinson, and Hutchinson, Anderson, Cox, Coons & DuPriest, P.C, Eugene.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on its action to recover on a promissory note executed by defendant. The trial court entered the judgment after it granted a directed verdict for plaintiff under ORCP 60 at the close of plaintiff's case.1 In his amended answer, defendant alleges several affirmative defenses, including real party in interest, waiver, laches, partial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases