HUNTLEY v. FRITO-LAY, INC.

No. 42078-0-I.

979 P.2d 488 (1999)

Robert HUNTLEY, Michael Hill, Richard Henry, Brent Dove, Kenneth Reynolds, Jackie Jewell, Michael Morris, William Welch, Bert Borg, Fred Bellows, and Sherman Perkins, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Appellants, v. FRITO-LAY, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

July 6, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Rathbone Johnson, Kenneth James Pedersen, Davies, Roberts & Reid, Seattle, for Appellants.

Rudy Albert Englund, Douglas Edward Smith, Nancy Watkins Anderson, Allison Steincipher Wallin, Lane Powell Spears Lubersky, Seattle, for Respondent.


BAKER, J.

Seeking class certification, several of Frito-Lay's employees sued the company for breach of contract and violations of the Washington Minimum Wage Act (MWA).1 Frito-Lay moved for summary judgment arguing that the claims were preempted by federal law (section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (LMRA)),2 and should either be dismissed or arbitration compelled under the terms of the collective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases