1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 989 P.2d
  5. 989 P.2d 465 (1999)
 

HEUSEL v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY D. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

(9703-01834; CA A101622)

989 P.2d 465 (1999)

163 Or. App. 51

Charles HEUSEL, Appellant, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 22, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carson D. Bowler, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.

Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and ARMSTRONG, Judges.

HASELTON, J.

Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the trial court's allowance of a directed verdict against his claims for false imprisonment and negligence. The court concluded that defendant Multnomah County District Attorney's office was absolutely immune from those claims. We affirm.

The material facts, as set out in the parties' stipulated facts and associated exhibits, are straightforward. In December 1993, plaintiff's former girlfriend, Bernardi, obtained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases