1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 526 U.S.
  5. 526 U.S. 838 (1999)
 

O'SULLIVAN v. BOERCKEL

No. 97-2048.

526 U.S. 838 (1999)

119 S.Ct. 1728

144 L.Ed.2d 1

O'SULLIVAN v. BOERCKEL

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 7, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Browers, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were James E. Ryan, Attorney General, and Michael M. Glick, Assistant Attorney General.

David B. Mote argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard H. Parsons and Jeffrey T. Green.*

O'Connor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Souter, J., filed a concurring opinion, p. 849. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ., joined, p. 850. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Stevens and Ginsburg, JJ., joined, p. 862.

Justice O'Connor, delivered the opinion of the Court.

Federal habeas relief is available to state prisoners only after they have exhausted their claims in state court. 28 U. S. C. §§ 2254(b)(1), (c) (1994 ed. and Supp. III). In this case, we are asked to decide whether a state prisoner must present his claims to a state supreme court in a petition for discretionary review in order to satisfy the exhaustion requirement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases