1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 526 U.S.
  5. 526 U.S. 808 (1999)
 

HANLON v. BERGER

No. 97-1927.

526 U.S. 808 (1999)

119 S.Ct. 1706

143 L.Ed.2d 978

HANLON et al. v. BERGER et ux.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 24, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Cordray argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was James A. Anzelmo.

Henry H. Rossbacher argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for respondents Berger et al. were Nanci E. Nishimura and Jay F. Lansing. P. Cameron DeVore, Jessica L. Goldman, and David C. Kohler filed briefs for respondents Cable News Network, Inc., et al.*

Per Curiam.

Respondents Paul and Erma Berger sued petitioners— special agents of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and an assistant United States attorney—for damages under Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). They alleged that the conduct of petitioners had violated their rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases