1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 53 F.Supp.2d
  5. 53 F.Supp.2d 1223 (1999)
 

VAN DEELEN v. CITY OF EUDORA, KAN.

No. 96-4040-SAC.

53 F.Supp.2d 1223 (1999)

Michael D. VAN DEELEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF EUDORA, KANSAS; Bill Long; Greg Dahlem; Ken Massey; Doug Hunsinger; Frank Diehl; and Nine John and/or Jane Does; Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

June 29, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. VanDeelen, Eudora, KS, for Plaintiff.

Christopher F. Burger, Office of Atty. gen., Topeka, KS, Donald Patterson, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, Topeka, KS, for Defendants.

John M. Cooley, Tamko Roofing Products, Inc., Joplin, MO, Jeffrey A. Kennard, Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin LLP, Overland Park, KS, Theresa M. Nuckolls, Riling, Burkhead & Nitcher, Chtd., Lawrence, KS, Glenn R. Trapp, Office of Dist. Atty., Lawrence, KS, Roger W. Warren, Sanders Conkright & Warren LLP, Kansas City, MO, for Movant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, Senior District Judge.

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights case comes before the court on the defendant Frank Diehl's motion to dismiss complaint (Dk.180). Though this motion has been fully briefed for some time, the court's docket has kept it from rendering a timely decision. The court apologizes for this unavoidable delay.

The plaintiff appearing pro se has sued Frank Diehl in his individual capacity

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases