BERGSTEIN v. MYERS

(SC S46367, S46369, SC S46368, S46370, SC S46371, S46372)

984 P.2d 265 (1999)

328 Or. 661

Leonard J. BERGSTEIN, Petitioner, v. Hardy MYERS, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent, and Gregory Kafoury and Ronda Hatefi, Intervenors. Jim Eastridge, Petitioner, v. Hardy Myers, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent, and Gregory Kafoury and Ronda Hatefi, Intervenors. Denise M. Mills, Petitioner, v. Hardy Myers, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent, and Gregory Kafoury and Ronda Hatefi, Intervenors.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided June 11, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Hinkle, of Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner Bergstein.

James E. Mountain, Jr., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner Eastridge. With him on the petition were Brendan C. Dunn, Bruce A. Bishop, and Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C., Salem.

Michael Mills, of Mills & McMillin P.C., Salem, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner Mills.

Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the responses were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, Salem.

Linda K. Williams, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for intervenors.


PER CURIAM.

These are six ballot title review proceedings brought under ORS 250.085(2). They concern two closely related proposed initiative measures (distinguished principally by the fact that one is in the form of a statutory enactment while the other is a constitutional amendment) that deal with video poker and other video games. The proceedings have been consolidated for the purposes of argument and opinion. All petitioners are electors who timely submitted written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases