1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 77 F.Supp.2d
  5. 77 F.Supp.2d 1153 (1999)
 

BRUMBAUGH v. SANDOZ PHARMACEUTICAL CORP.

No. CV 97-088-GF-DWM.

77 F.Supp.2d 1153 (1999)

Barbara BRUMBAUGH, Plaintiff, v. SANDOZ PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division.

September 27, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Gregoire, Stephanie A. Reinhardt, Smith, Walsh, Clarke & Gregoire, Great Falls, MT, for Barbara Brumbaugh, plaintiff.

William D. Jacobsen, Steven T. Potts, Thompson, Jacobsen & Potts, Great Falls, MT, Joe G. Hollingsworth, Katharine R. Latimer, Gary I. Rubin, Kirby T. Griffis, Spriggs & Hollingsworth, Washington, DC, for Sandoz Pharmaceutical Corp, defendant.

ORDER

MOLLOY, District Judge.

This case is about a postpartum drug that allegedly causes significant medical problems in some women who use it. The crux of the issue before me is the Daubert question: should plaintiff's expert be allowed to testify.

Defendant Sandoz moves the Court for summary judgment on the issue of medical causation since the expected testimony of plaintiff's medical causation expert is unreliable and not based on accepted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases