1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 974 P.2d
  5. 974 P.2d 254 (1999)
 

STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. v. FLATH

9311-83501; CA A99616.

974 P.2d 254 (1999)

158 Or. App. 249

In the Matter of Nathan Flath, a Minor Child. STATE ex rel. JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent, v. Nathan FLATH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 10, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brenda Shum argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Katherine O. Osborn.

David J. Amesbury, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before WARREN, Presiding Judge, and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, Judges.

WARREN, P.J.

Defendant appeals a juvenile court order finding him within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court because of an act that, if done by an adult, would constitute the crime of delivery of a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school. ORS 475.999(1)(a).1 He makes three assignments of error regarding the trial court's jurisdictional finding; only the third merits discussion. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases