1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 60 F.Supp.2d
  5. 60 F.Supp.2d 52 (1999)
 

BRAVO CO. v. CHUM, LTD.

No. 97-CV-4689 (DRH).

60 F.Supp.2d 52 (1999)

BRAVO COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CHUM, LTD., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

August 17, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pennie & Edmonds, LLP, New York City, by James W. Dabney, Kelly D. Talcott, Jacqueline M. Lesser, for plaintiff.

Skadden Arps Slate Meager & Flom, LLP, New York City, by Kenneth A. Plevan, Bruce J. Goldner, Diane Kasselman, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

HURLEY, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the motion of Defendant Chum Limited ("Chum") to dismiss the action on the grounds of forum non conveniens.1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Bravo Company ("Bravo") is the producer and owner of a cable television service that features film and arts programming. (Compl.¶¶...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases