1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 591 N.W.2d
  5. 591 N.W.2d 507 (1999)
 

LEEK v. AMERICAN EXP. PROPERTY CAS.

No. C7-98-1911.

591 N.W.2d 507 (1999)

Mary LEEK, Respondent, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS PROPERTY CASUALTY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 6, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark E. Gilbert, Giebel, Gilbert & Kohl, P.L.L.P., St. Paul, for respondent.

Michael J. Tomsche, Tomsche, Sonnesyn & Tomsche, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge, LANSING, Judge, and WILLIS, Judge.

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge

Appellant American Express Property Casualty challenges the district court's dismissal of an action to vacate a no-fault arbitration award for lack of jurisdiction due to improper service. American Express argues that under Minn. R. No-Fault Arb. 29 a party may initiate an action in district court without complying with Minn. R. Civ. P. 4. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Mary Leek sought no-fault benefits from American...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases