1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 74 F.Supp.2d
  5. 74 F.Supp.2d 1019 (1999)
 

U.S. v. MICROTEK INTERN. DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS DIV.

Criminal No. 99-298-KI.

74 F.Supp.2d 1019 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MICROTEK INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION, INC., Joe-Pin Ouyang, and Hamad Janversan, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

November 17, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kristine Olson, U.S. Attorney, Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for U.S.

Per A. Ramfjord, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, OR, Robert E. Sims, George B. Newhouse, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant Microtek Intern. Development Systems Div., Inc.

Bryan D. Daly, Charles L. Kreindler, Beck, Decorso, Daly, Barrera & Kreindler, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant Joe-Pin Ouyang.

Susan Elizabeth Reese, Portland, OR, for Defendant Hamid Janversan.

OPINION AND ORDER

KING, District Judge.

On October 7, 1999, I filed an opinion concerning defendants Microtek and Ouyang's motion to compel discovery. Before the court is the government's motion for reconsideration or clarification of discovery order (# 69).

DISCUSSION

In their earlier discovery motion, defendants sought all documents, including "responses to queries or `opinion letters,' advice or recommendations by U.S. Department of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases