1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 3 P.3d
  5. 3 P.3d 1058 (1999)
 

PIMA COUNTY v. HOGAN

No. 2 CA-CV 99-0065.

3 P.3d 1058 (1999)

197 Ariz. 138

PIMA COUNTY, a body politic and corporate, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Jerome P. HOGAN, an unmarried man, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

November 30, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney by Thomas E. Dugal, Tucson, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Stubbs & Schubart, P.C. by Damian M. Fellows, Tucson, for Appellee.

OPINION

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Pima County (the County) appeals the trial court's order denying its request for sanctions against appellee Jerome Hogan under Rule 68, Ariz. R. Civ. P., 16 A.R.S., after a bench trial in this eminent domain action. The County contends that the trial court erred when it found that Rule 68 did not apply to eminent domain proceedings, relying instead on A.R.S. § 12-1128. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases