McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was tried before a jury and convicted of robbery. This appeal followed the denial of defendant's motion for new trial. Held:
Defendant contends the State's eyewitness testimony was insufficient to authorize the jury's finding that he committed the robbery. This assertion is without merit.
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.