1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 736 A.2d
  5. 736 A.2d 295 (1999)
 

HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. v. HIMELFARB

No. 144, Sept. Term, 1998.

736 A.2d 295 (1999)

355 Md. 671

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Herbert HIMELFARB et al.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

August 30, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Reede, Jr. (Donald L. Speidel, Niles, Barton & Wilmer, on brief), Baltimore, for Petitioner.

Benjamin A. Klopman (M. Michael Cramer, Cramer & Klopman, Chartered, on brief), Rockville, for Respondents.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL and ROBERT L. KARWACKI (retired, specially assigned), JJ.

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This is an action under a commercial property policy by insureds against the insurer to recover for loss due to theft. The sole issue before us is whether the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment for the insurer based on the insurer's contention that the insured had failed to comply with the sixty day time limit on filing a proof of loss that is provided by ¶ E.3.a(7) of the policy. Paragraph E.3.a(7) is set forth below, in the context...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases