1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 64 F.Supp.2d
  5. 64 F.Supp.2d 37 (1999)
 

WILLIAMS v. LOPES

No. 3:96 CV 2505(GLG).

64 F.Supp.2d 37 (1999)

Patricia WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Edward LOPES and Sergeant Brunelli, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

August 16, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Williams, Williams, Polan & Pattis, New Haven, CT, for plaintiff.

Marcia Gleeson, Sack, Spector & Barrett, West Hartford, CT, for defendants.

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, defendants move for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, defendants' motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

The facts set forth in defendants' Local Rule 9(c)1 Statement are largely uncontested. They are as follows (exhibit numbers are those attached to moving papers):

1. On August 12, 1996, Danbury police officers Edward Lopes and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases