1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 23 F.Supp.2d
  5. 23 F.Supp.2d 72 (1998)
 

U.S. v. HUDDLESTON

No. Crim. 97-70-P-H.

23 F.Supp.2d 72 (1998)

UNITED STATES of America v. Mark E. HUDDLESTON, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

August 7, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan A. Toff, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, ME, for U.S.

Bruce M. Merrill, Portland, ME, for Defendant.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

HORNBY, Chief Judge.

This new trial motion raises two issues: (1) Is a new trial required because of a Brady/Giglio violation? (2) Does newly discovered evidence of perjury by two government witnesses require a new trial? I find no "reasonable likelihood" or "reasonable probability" that the verdict would or could have been affected by either the alleged Brady/Giglio violation or the admitted perjury. Accordingly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases