1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 23 F.Supp.2d
  5. 23 F.Supp.2d 929 (1998)
 

MICELI v. ANSELL, INC.

No. 2:98-CV-134-RL.

23 F.Supp.2d 929 (1998)

Karin and John MICELI, Plaintiffs, v. ANSELL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division.

October 21, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel B. Vinovich, Hilbrich Cunningham & Schwerd, Highland, IN, for Plaintiffs.

Martin D. Hoke, Natalie V. Shrader and David P. Burow-Flak, Knight Hoppe Fanning & Knight, Schererville, IN, for Defendant.

ORDER

LOZANO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant, Ansell, Inc.'s, Motion to Dismiss, filed on June 29, 1998. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

Karin Miceli ("Karen") and John Miceli (together "Plaintiffs") are citizens of Indiana. On or about May 11, 1997, Plaintiffs allegedly purchased and used a condom manufactured by Ansell, Inc. ("Defendant") in Chicago...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases