1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 30 F.Supp.2d
  5. 30 F.Supp.2d 901 (1998)
 

U.S. v. ARMSTRONG

Criminal No. 91-526-A.

30 F.Supp.2d 901 (1998)

UNITED STATES of America v. David M. ARMSTRONG, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

December 17, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Thomas M. Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff.

Michael W. Lieberman, Alexandria, VA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

Is the exclusionary rule applicable in supervised release revocation hearings? This is the troublesome question presented by the petition for revocation of defendant David Armstrong's supervised release based on evidence seized incident to his arrest in the District of Columbia, which evidence was ultimately suppressed in the District of Columbia prosecution stemming from that arrest. A Fourth Circuit decision, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases