1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 1 F.Supp.2d
  5. 1 F.Supp.2d 898 (1998)
 

ALLARD v. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE CO., INC.

No. IP 93-1346-C M/S.

1 F.Supp.2d 898 (1998)

Debra ALLARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

April 20, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Waterfill, Leagre Chandler & Millard, Indianapolis, IN, David L. Rose, Law Office of David Rose, Washington, DC, C. Warren Holland, Holland & Holland, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiffs.

Michael Bergin, Ariane S. Johnson, Locke Reynolds Boyd & Weisell, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant.

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

McKINNEY, District Judge.

I. MOTIONS TO STRIKE

Rule 56(e) requires that affidavits supporting or opposing a motion for summary judgment set forth facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show "affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters" presented. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). Courts may permit an affidavit to be supplemented or opposed by depositions, answers to interrogatories, or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases