1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 29 F.Supp.2d
  5. 29 F.Supp.2d 855 (1998)
 

AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF OH v. OHIO BELL TELEPHONE

No. C2-97-443.

29 F.Supp.2d 855 (1998)

AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF OHIO, INC., Plaintiff, v. OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, dba Ameritech Ohio, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

March 30, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Matthews, Vorys, Saters Seymour & Pease, Columbus, OH, for plaintiff.

Alvin J. McKenna, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Columbus, OH, Steven T. Nourse, Ohio Atty. General's Office, Columbus, OH, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the motion of defendant Ohio Bell Telephone Company, dba Ameritech Ohio ("Ameritech") to dismiss Counts Four and Five of the Complaint. (Doc. No. 19). Defendant, Public Utility Commission of Ohio ("PUCO"), has also filed a Motion to Dismiss which, inter alia, raises similar arguments advanced by Ameritech with respect to Counts Four and Five of the Complaint.

Before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases