1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 496 S.E.2d
  5. 496 S.E.2d 376 (1998)
 

CAIN v. GENCOR, INC.

No. 318PA97.

496 S.E.2d 376 (1998)

347 N.C. 657

Lennon David CAIN and Linda S. Cain, husband and wife v. GENCOR, INC., an Ohio corporation, d/b/a General Tire and Rubber Corporation, Inc., an Ohio corporation.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DeVore & Acton, P.A. by Fred W. DeVore III, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellees.

Dean & Gibson, L.L.P. by Rodney Dean and D. Christopher Osborn, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Under Rule 51(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, the trial judge is no longer required to summarize or recapitulate the evidence, or to explain the application of the law to the evidence. Nor is the judge required to state the contentions of the parties. However, if the judge undertakes to state the contentions of the parties, equal stress must be given to the contentions of each party.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases