1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 509 S.E.2d
  5. 509 S.E.2d 348 (1998)
 

DOCUTRONICS, INC. v. REITMAN

No. A98A0981.

509 S.E.2d 348 (1998)

235 Ga. App. 268

DOCUTRONICS, INC. v. REITMAN.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

November 13, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, H. Lamar Mixson, Jill A. Pryor, Lynn M. Adam, Atlanta, for appellant.

Morris, Manning & Martin, Laureen M. Seeger, Troutman Sanders, Alan W. Loeffler, Sherri M. Graves, Atlanta, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

This appeal presents the limited issue of whether a jury verdict was inconsistent in its award of damages to the parties on their claims and cross-claims below. Appellant Docutronics, Inc. contends that the verdict was contradictory and ambiguous, because the jury inconsistently awarded damages, including punitive damages, against Docutronics on Pyramid Technology Corporation's fraudulent conveyance claim, while declining to award damages on Docutronics...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases