RUMSAVICH v. BORISLOW

No. 98-1207.

154 F.3d 700 (1998)

Peter J. RUMSAVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel M. BORISLOW, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 28, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy P. Amatore, Marty J. Schwartz (argued), Chicago, IL, for Plantiff-Appellant.

Damon E. Dunn, Levin & Funkhouser, Chicago, IL, Philip W. Horton (argued), Arnold & Porter, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BAUER, HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.


EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Most suits under the diversity jurisdiction seeking to collect on unpaid promissory notes are straightforward affairs. Not this one. The supposed maker of the note contended that the document is phony. After a bench trial, the district judge concluded that plaintiff Peter Rumsavich is a forger and a perjurer.

Rumsavich received payments from Tel-Save, Inc., for marketing long distance communication services. A dispute developed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases