1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 17 F.Supp.2d
  5. 17 F.Supp.2d 816 (1998)
 

EMERALD PORK, II, LTD. v. PURINA MILLS, INC.

No. 97-3350.

17 F.Supp.2d 816 (1998)

Emerald PORK, II, Ltd., an Illinois corporation and Michael R. Hack, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. PURINA MILLS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division.

September 23, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Davlantis, Springfield, IL, for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants.

Thomas H. Wilson, Stephen R. Kautmann, Michael J. Kokal, Springfield, IL, for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.

Does the Illinois Commercial Feed Act of 1961 provide for an implied private cause of action?

No.

I. FACTS ALLEGED IN THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs produce, finish, and sell commercial swine and hogs in Illinois. Defendant manufactures and sells commercial animal feed, including swine feed. From June 1996, Plaintiffs fed their swine nothing but Defendant's swine feed. Therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases