1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 17 F.Supp.2d
  5. 17 F.Supp.2d 793 (1998)
 

PIPITONE v. U.S.

No. 97 C 4751.

17 F.Supp.2d 793 (1998)

Andrew PIPITONE and Joanne Pipitone, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

August 24, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Pipitone, Chicago, IL, pro se.

Douglas W. Snoeyenbos, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for U.S.

OPINION and ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court are cross motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Defendant's motion (Doc. No. 8) is granted and Plaintiffs' motion (Doc. No. 13) is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

This is a tax refund action. From December 1981 until January 1995, Plaintiff Andrew Pipitone ("Pipitone") was an at-will employee in the claims department...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases