1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 522 U.S.
  5. 522 U.S. 287 (1998)
 

LUNDING v. NEW YORK TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL

No. 96-1462.

522 U.S. 287 (1998)

118 S.Ct. 766

139 L.Ed.2d 717

LUNDING et ux. v. NEW YORK TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 21, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher H. Lunding, pro se, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was John E. Smith.

Andrew D. Bing, Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for respondent Commissioner of Taxation and Finance were Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney General, Barbara G. Billet, Solicitor General, and Peter H. Schiff, Deputy Solicitor General.*

Justice O'Connor, delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Privileges and Immunities Clause, U. S. Const., Art. IV, § 2, provides that "[t]he Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." In this case, we consider whether a provision of New York law that effectively denies only nonresident taxpayers an income tax deduction for alimony paid is consistent with that constitutional command. We conclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases