TELECTRONICS PACING SYSTEMS, INC. v. GUIDANT CORP.

Nos. 97-1785, 97-2016.

143 F.3d 428 (1998)

TELECTRONICS PACING SYSTEMS, INC.; Telectronics Holding, Ltd.; Telectronics Pty., Ltd.; Medical Telectronics Holding and Finance Co., (BV); Telectronics, NV; TPLC, Inc.; Telectronics, SA; Pacesetter, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. GUIDANT CORPORATION; Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.; Guidant Sales Corp.; Eli Lilly and Co., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided May 4, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George F. McGunnigle, Minneapolis, MN, argued (Michael A.G. Korengold, Minneapolis, MN, on the brief), for Appellants.

Robert K. Stanley, Indianapolis, IN, argued (John R. Schaibley, III, Indianapolis, IN, Winthrop A. Rockwell and Eric E. Jorstad, Minneapolis, MN, on the brief), for Appellees

Before FAGG, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.


MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

This case involves an attempted transfer of rights under a patent licensing agreement. It was brought by certain companies involved in designing, manufacturing, and distributing cardiac stimulation devices (collectively the Telectronics Group and Pacesetter) against several competitors in the medical device business (collectively the Lilly Group) who had filed a state declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that the attempted transfer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases