HURST v. STATE BALLOT LAW COMMISSION


428 Mass. 116 (1998)

JON HURST & others v. STATE BALLOT LAW COMMISSION & others.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.

July 31, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Kiley for the plaintiffs.

Margaret Monsell, Assistant Attorney General, for State Ballot Law Commission & another.

Edward Francis Kelly (Gary S. Brackett with him) for John O'Connor & others.

Present: WILKINS, C.J., ABRAMS, LYNCH, GREANEY, FRIED, MARSHALL, & IRELAND, JJ.


FRIED, J.

This court's order of July 14, 1998, affirmed the ruling of the State Ballot Law Commission (commission) that the plaintiffs did not comply with the commission's discovery rule, 801 Code Mass. Regs. § 1.01(8)(f), as modified by 950 Code Mass. Regs. § 59.03(18) (1993), and thus failed to challenge with sufficient particularity signatures from Barnstable and Berkshire counties. This opinion states the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases