1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 82 Ohio
  5. 82 Ohio St.3d 423 (1998)
 

TUCKER v. McANINCH

No. 97-2618.

82 Ohio St.3d 423 (1998)

TUCKER, APPELLANT, v. McANINCH ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 29, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Tucker, pro se.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the following reasons. First, Tucker did not attach commitment papers pertinent to his claim challenging the APA's parole revocation. State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 287, 288, 685 N.E.2d 1243, 1244. Second, "`[a]s long as an unreasonable delay has not occurred, the remedy for noncompliance with the Morrissey...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases