1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 6 F.Supp.2d
  5. 6 F.Supp.2d 324 (1998)
 

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM ANIMAL v. SCHERING-PLOUGH

No. 96-04047 (HAA).

6 F.Supp.2d 324 (1998)

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM ANIMAL HEALTH, INC., Plaintiff, v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and Schering Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

April 27, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan A. Marshall, Jennifer Gordon, Scott D. Simpson, Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, H. Curtis Meanor, William Sandelands, Podvey, Sachs, Meanor, Catenacci, Hildner & Cocoziello, Newark, NJ, for Plaintiff.

Sidney David, Paul H. Konchanski, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, Westfield, NJ, for Defendants.

OPINION

HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by both parties in this patent litigation and upon plaintiff's renewed motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons detailed below, the motions are DENIED.

I. Background

These motions follow the court's recent denial of plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. See Boehringer Ingelheim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases