STATE EX REL. ADKINS v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTH.

No. 98-38.

82 Ohio St.3d 171 (1998)

THE STATE EX REL. ADKINS, APPELLANT, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 17, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Adkins, pro se.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Brian M. Zets, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Adkins asserts in his various propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ. For the following reasons, however, we find Adkins's contentions to be meritless.

First, Adkins was not entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel his release from prison on parole. Habeas corpus, rather than mandamus, is the proper action for persons claiming entitlement to immediate release from prison. State ex rel. Finfrock...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases