SUNDQUIST HOMES v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD # 1

No. 39938-1-I.

965 P.2d 1148 (1998)

SUNDQUIST HOMES, INC., a Washington corporation, Echelbarger Development, Inc., a Washington corporation, Simmie Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Phoenix Development, a Washington corporation, Alfred Mus and Donald Saunders, Appellants, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

November 2, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian M. Green, Provo, UT, Robert Clayton Rowley, Kirkland, for Appellants.

James Deno, Everett, for Respondent.

Stephen Harold G. Overstreet, Olympia, for Amicus Building Industry Association of Washington.


APPELWICK, Judge.

By statute, entities with franchises to use county rights of way must pay the cost of relocating their facilities when the county roads where those facilities are located are improved. Thus, between the county and a franchisee, the statute assigns liability for those costs to the franchisee. But the statute does not prohibit franchisees like Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1 from charging those relocation costs to developers,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases