1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 965 P.2d
  5. 965 P.2d 1030 (1998)
 

REESMAN v. HIGHFILL

CC 94C-11060; CA A92453; SC S44639.

965 P.2d 1030 (1998)

327 Or. 597

William R. REESMAN, Respondent on Review, v. Richard HIGHFILL and Jim Wilson, Petitioners on Review, and Jack Murray, Barnard Clark and People Against Aurora Airport Expansion, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided October 29, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith J. Bauer, of Parks, Bauer, Sime & Winkler LLP, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review Richard Highfill. With him on the petition was Billy M. Sime.

William Earle, of Abbott, Davis, Rothwell, Mullin & Earle, PC, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review Jim Wilson. With him on the petition was Alan Gladstone.

David D. Park, of Elliot & Park, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, DURHAM, KULONGOSKI and LEESON, JJ.

LEESON, Justice.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Plaintiff William Reesman brought this action for defamation and invasion of privacy by false light after defendants1 printed and distributed a flyer between March 11 and March 17, 1994, on behalf of the organization People Against Aurora Airport Expansion (PAAAX). The circuit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases