1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 42 F.Supp.2d
  5. 42 F.Supp.2d 147 (1998)
 

CINO v. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT

No. Civ. 3:96-1164 (DJS).

42 F.Supp.2d 147 (1998)

Bernard CINO, Plaintiff, v. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT and United Technologies Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

September 30, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Barnes, Rosenstein & Barnes, Fairfield, CT, for Bernard Cino, plaintiff.

Gary L. Lieber, Anessa Abrams, Schmeltzer, Aptaker & Shepard, Washington, DC, Edward J. Dempsey, United Technologies Corp., Hartford, CT, for defendants.

RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SQUATRITO, District Judge.

This is an action for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. ("ADA"). The defendant has filed the within motion for summary judgment on all of the plaintiff's claims. The issue presented is whether the defendant discriminated against the plaintiff due to his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases