1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 998 F.Supp.
  5. 998 F.Supp. 889 (1998)
 

SOO LINE R. CO. v. TANG INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 97 C 0670.

998 F.Supp. 889 (1998)

SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TANG INDUSTRIES, INC.; Cometco Corporation and Cozzi Iron & Metal, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

March 13, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas L. Hogan, Thomas F. Tobin, Mary Lisa Sullivan Kamins, Connelly & Schroeder, Chicago, IL, Isley D. Colton, Leonard, Street and Deinard, St. Paul, MN, for Plaintiff.

Joel S. Feldman, Edward V. Walsh, III, Sachnoff & Weaver, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Thomas Vernon Skinner, Paul A. Duffy, Patrick F. Gordon, Jane DiRenzo Pigott, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEINENWEBER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Soo Line Railroad Company ("Soo Line") sues three entities who previously leased a portion of its railroad yard, Tang Industries, Inc. ("Tang"), Cometco Corporation ("Cometco") and Cozzi Iron & Metal, Inc. ("Cozzi"), for contribution and response costs recovery under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1990 ("CERCLA"), as amended, 42 U.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases