1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 995 F.Supp.
  5. 995 F.Supp. 889 (1998)
 

NEAL v. HONEYWELL INC.

No. 93 C 1143.

995 F.Supp. 889 (1998)

Judith A. NEAL, Plaintiff, v. HONEYWELL INC., et al., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

February 13, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Holloway, Michael John Leech, William G. Swindal, Thomas Stanley Malciauskas, Robert Hill Smeltzer, Eric W. Apple, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago, IL, for Judith A. Neal.

James A. Burstein, Michael A. Warner, Thomas Hill Peckham, Michael B. Hubbard, Noah A. Finkel, Seyfarth, Shaw Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, IL, for Honeywell Inc. and Alliant Techsystems Inc.

Michael D. Monico, Monico, Pavich % Spevack, Chicago, IL, for Janis Frederick.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PLUNKETT, District Judge.

Before us is a prolix stack of post-trial motions filed by both the plaintiff, Ms. Neal, and the defendant, Honeywell. The three-week trial which preceded them told the disturbing story of a munitions manufacturer (the Joliet Arsenal, a division of Honeywell) during the mid-1980's. Honeywell, unlike the arms maker who created a peace prize or who contributed profits to the poor,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases