1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 998 F.Supp.
  5. 998 F.Supp. 874 (1998)
 

UNITED TRANSP. UNION v. ILLINOIS CENT. R.R.

No. 97 C 2128.

998 F.Supp. 874 (1998)

UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD, Respondent, and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Respondent-Intervenor.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

March 11, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick Joseph Harrington, Harrington, Thompson, Acker & Harrington, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Kevin C. Brodar, United Transportation Union, Cleveland, OH, for United Transportation Union.

Ronald A. Lane, Illinois Central Railroad Company, Edward Nathan Druck, Franczek, Sullivan, Mann, Crement, Hein, Relias, P.C., Chicago, IL, for Illinois Central Railroad.

William Liasson Phillips, William L. Phillips, Chicago, IL, Harold A. Ross, Ross & Kraushaar, Cleveland, OH, for Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, Senior District Judge.

Although this case is now before the court on United Transportation Union's (UTU) petition to enforce an arbitrator's award under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., it has a long history. It stems from the historic disputes between UTU and respondent Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (BLE) regarding the representation of railroad employees. BLE represents locomotive engineers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases