1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 968 P.2d
  5. 968 P.2d 900 (1998)
 

CITY OF SEATTLE v. MEGREY

No. 41732-1-I.

968 P.2d 900 (1998)

CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent, v. Bernard MEGREY, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

December 14, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Danko, Seattle, for Appellant.

Moses F. Garcia, Seattle, for Respondent.

APPELWICK, Judge.

A person restrained by an antiharassment order may not send a demand letter, not required in the cause of litigation, to the person protected by the antiharrassment order. The content of a letter sent in violation of an antiharrassment order need not contain harassing information. Knowledge that the letter is sent in violation of the order is enough to sustain a conviction for contempt. The trial court is affirmed.

FACTS

When their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases