1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 84 Ohio
  5. 84 Ohio St.3d 82 (1998)
 

STATE EX REL. YATES v. DEPT. OF REHAB. AND CORRECTION

No. 98-1094.

84 Ohio St.3d 82 (1998)

THE STATE EX REL. YATES, APPELLANT, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 2, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Danny V. Yates, pro se.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Brian M. Zets, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

Yates asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ. For the following reasons, however, Yates's claims lack merit.

First, as the court of appeals concluded, neither Ohio Adm.Code 5120-9-261 nor any other administrative regulation imposes a clear legal duty on appellees to permit Yates to be given a polygraph examination at his request.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases