IN RE NATHANIEL B.


710 A.2d 921 (1998)

1998 ME 99

In re NATHANIEL B. et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided May 5, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen JM Mitchell, Augusta, for appellants (father).

Pamela J. Ames, Waterville, for appellants (mother).

Lawrence P. Bloom, Skowhegan, Guardian ad Litem.

Andrew Ketterer, Attorney General, Marci A. Alexander, Pat Stevens, Janice S. Stuver, Asst. Attys. Gen., Augusta, for appellee.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, LIPEZ, and SAUFLEY, JJ.


DANA, Justice.

[¶ 1] The parents of Nathaniel B. appeal from the judgment of the District Court (Skowhegan, Cote, J.) terminating their parental rights. The mother also appeals from the termination of her parental rights to her child Joseph G. They assert that the court erred by applying an inappropriate time period when determining parental unfitness, and that there was insufficient evidence to support the court's findings of parental unfitness. We disagree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases