ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Sanders appeals his convictions for first degree robbery and armed criminal action. He claims that the motion court plainly erred in failing to, sua sponte, declare a mistrial when the prosecutor, during closing argument, made statements which Mr. Sanders suggests were improper personal epithets and which improperly invoked fears of Mr. Sanders' propensity to commit future crimes.
Because we disagree with Mr. Sanders...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
